<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vetting advertisers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/03/27/vetting-advertisers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/03/27/vetting-advertisers/</link>
	<description>wrangling code for Automattic&#039;s WordPress.com VIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimalism and my ideal news experience &#171; Diversions</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/03/27/vetting-advertisers/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minimalism and my ideal news experience &#171; Diversions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=521#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a news organization were to pair this relevancy with vetted advertisements then things could really start getting interesting. This could go a long way to solving the [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a news organization were to pair this relevancy with vetted advertisements then things could really start getting interesting. This could go a long way to solving the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Baskind</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/03/27/vetting-advertisers/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Baskind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=521#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, that&#039;s unfortunate. We&#039;ve blocked Fiji from our AdSense contextuals several times, but Google&#039;s tools aren&#039;t very good at handling this. Try, try again ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s unfortunate. We&#8217;ve blocked Fiji from our AdSense contextuals several times, but Google&#8217;s tools aren&#8217;t very good at handling this. Try, try again &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/03/27/vetting-advertisers/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=521#comment-190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like both ideas—yours and Dave&#039;s—but I&#039;m not sure they could be categorized together. Making sure advertisers are consumer-friendly is not the same as consumers voting on whether they like particular advertisements. That said, the increased visibility might encourage better practices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both ideas—yours and Dave&#8217;s—but I&#8217;m not sure they could be categorized together. Making sure advertisers are consumer-friendly is not the same as consumers voting on whether they like particular advertisements. That said, the increased visibility might encourage better practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

