<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free strategic advice for the @dailyemerald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/</link>
	<description>wrangling code for Automattic&#039;s WordPress.com VIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Clicked On: collaboration abounds &#124; CoPress</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[We Clicked On: collaboration abounds &#124; CoPress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] chorus of discontent about the Daily Emerald, I wrote a post about the steps they should take to regain trust and learn how to innovate. It&#8217;s all about transparency, and I think such transparency could lead to better buy-in from [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chorus of discontent about the Daily Emerald, I wrote a post about the steps they should take to regain trust and learn how to innovate. It&#8217;s all about transparency, and I think such transparency could lead to better buy-in from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrap-up of last night&#8217;s #collegejourn chat &#8211; Innovation in College Media</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wrap-up of last night&#8217;s #collegejourn chat &#8211; Innovation in College Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] topic was inspired by Daniel Bachhuber&#8217;s recent blog post about how to turn the Daily Emerald into &#8220;a successful digital news [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] topic was inspired by Daniel Bachhuber&#8217;s recent blog post about how to turn the Daily Emerald into &#8220;a successful digital news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diversions &#187; Advice for college newspapers</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diversions &#187; Advice for college newspapers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Free strategic advice for the @dailyemerald - Daniel Bachhuber. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Free strategic advice for the @dailyemerald &#8211; Daniel Bachhuber. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post Daniel. Some really good ideas in there. Like Adam I don&#039;t know enough about the Emerald&#039;s revenue stream to honestly know whether a once-weekly or five-times-a-week is better. Seems to me though that those don&#039;t have to be the only options. For a college newspaper couldn&#039;t a twice-weekly make a lot of sense? That way they could publish on say Wednesday and Sunday. This would give them an issue (Wednesday) to cover the weekly on campus events, etc. and another issue (Sunday) to cover the weekend sports (both club and varsity). It would also give advertisers incentive to run ads in the Wednesday paper; they could do weekend-specific deals for students. Anyways, just my thoughts, good article though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Daniel. Some really good ideas in there. Like Adam I don&#8217;t know enough about the Emerald&#8217;s revenue stream to honestly know whether a once-weekly or five-times-a-week is better. Seems to me though that those don&#8217;t have to be the only options. For a college newspaper couldn&#8217;t a twice-weekly make a lot of sense? That way they could publish on say Wednesday and Sunday. This would give them an issue (Wednesday) to cover the weekly on campus events, etc. and another issue (Sunday) to cover the weekend sports (both club and varsity). It would also give advertisers incentive to run ads in the Wednesday paper; they could do weekend-specific deals for students. Anyways, just my thoughts, good article though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Betz</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Betz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel,

I do not know enough about the revenue streams of the Daily Emerald to suggest whether once-a-week or five-times-a-week printing is optimal, but I do agree with many of your suggestions here.

I am especially optimistic about point number 1). Every year at the company I work for (IBM), they do exactly what you suggest: hold a week-long, participatory, &lt;i&gt;on-line&lt;/i&gt; &quot;Jam session&quot; (They call in &quot;Innovation Jam&quot;). It is heavily advertised internally and to their business partners, and I suspect also some academic and public institutions as well. The idea is to get as much feedback as possible to see what new ideas people have, what the new future technology is, questions on management decisions, etc. It&#039;s a very successful program every year, and I&#039;m glad to see that this business strategy doesn&#039;t just apply to large international corporations, but that it is a good idea to adopt at much smaller levels - even as small as a student newspaper. Not to sound too dramatic, but the world has changed - it takes new ideas from &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; parties involved to make good decisions. No one single person, or group of people, has a monopoly on wisdom.

The other suggestion that I think the ODE could adopt immediately is 1) moving to just black-and-white. I don&#039;t know how much this would actually save for the print edition per issue, but it is a logical step that shaves the cost of production, and one that still does not hurt business partners and advertisers (they would, of course, disagree).

Good insight, and good constructive attitude!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>I do not know enough about the revenue streams of the Daily Emerald to suggest whether once-a-week or five-times-a-week printing is optimal, but I do agree with many of your suggestions here.</p>
<p>I am especially optimistic about point number 1). Every year at the company I work for (IBM), they do exactly what you suggest: hold a week-long, participatory, <i>on-line</i> &#8220;Jam session&#8221; (They call in &#8220;Innovation Jam&#8221;). It is heavily advertised internally and to their business partners, and I suspect also some academic and public institutions as well. The idea is to get as much feedback as possible to see what new ideas people have, what the new future technology is, questions on management decisions, etc. It&#8217;s a very successful program every year, and I&#8217;m glad to see that this business strategy doesn&#8217;t just apply to large international corporations, but that it is a good idea to adopt at much smaller levels &#8211; even as small as a student newspaper. Not to sound too dramatic, but the world has changed &#8211; it takes new ideas from <b>all</b> parties involved to make good decisions. No one single person, or group of people, has a monopoly on wisdom.</p>
<p>The other suggestion that I think the ODE could adopt immediately is 1) moving to just black-and-white. I don&#8217;t know how much this would actually save for the print edition per issue, but it is a logical step that shaves the cost of production, and one that still does not hurt business partners and advertisers (they would, of course, disagree).</p>
<p>Good insight, and good constructive attitude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Baker</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joey Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you saying that The Daily Emerald doesn&#039;t abide by the national averages and is loosing money on each print edition?

&#039;Cause, if so, then yes, they oughta cut down. If not, then there&#039;s no reason to get rid of a money maker until it starts to affect the prime product. If they can still make money off the print, but go web-first. It&#039;s worth keeping a secondary product around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that The Daily Emerald doesn&#8217;t abide by the national averages and is loosing money on each print edition?</p>
<p>&#8216;Cause, if so, then yes, they oughta cut down. If not, then there&#8217;s no reason to get rid of a money maker until it starts to affect the prime product. If they can still make money off the print, but go web-first. It&#8217;s worth keeping a secondary product around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;&quot;The paper likely can’t afford to go to one-day-a-week in print.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Great point Joey, but that&#039;s exactly what&#039;s up. It can&#039;t afford to stay a &lt;em&gt;paper&lt;/em&gt; any more either. It&#039;s not financially feasible to print once-a-week now, nor is it financially feasible to print five days a week now. It&#039;s just like the United States being addicted to foreign oil: the Daily Emerald needs a pretty significant investment in it&#039;s future. The other scenario is that they don&#039;t and keep limping along until 2 years from now when they &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; feel the crunch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;The paper likely can’t afford to go to one-day-a-week in print.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Great point Joey, but that&#8217;s exactly what&#8217;s up. It can&#8217;t afford to stay a <em>paper</em> any more either. It&#8217;s not financially feasible to print once-a-week now, nor is it financially feasible to print five days a week now. It&#8217;s just like the United States being addicted to foreign oil: the Daily Emerald needs a pretty significant investment in it&#8217;s future. The other scenario is that they don&#8217;t and keep limping along until 2 years from now when they <em>really</em> feel the crunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Baker</title>
		<link>http://danielbachhuber.com/2009/02/01/free-strategic-advice-for-the-dailyemerald/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joey Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielbachhuber.com/?p=406#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, positive suggestions here Daniel, but I have to disagree with one major point. The paper likely can&#039;t afford to go to one-day-a-week in print. If the Emerald&#039;s ad numbers follow the trend that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/01/college-newspapers-finally-hit-by-economic-downturn028.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most colleges seem to be in &lt;/a&gt;, loosing the print edition is just not financially feasible.

For a as yet &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copress.org/2008/12/04/but-we-make-all-our-money-from-newsprint/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;undetermined reason&lt;/a&gt;, print still works very well for the freesheet college media. Yes, we need to plan for a day when it won&#039;t, but for now, it&#039;s still the goose that&#039;s laying the golden (well… maybe pewter) eggs.

I&#039;d suggest that instead, they move to a web-first newsroom. Get them thinking of the print as a secondary product. It&#039;s what they put out for the business side, but all &lt;em&gt;real journalists&lt;/em&gt; at the paper are concern with the online edition first.

&#039;Course, figure out how to instill that mindset in a bunch of j-students that are still required to send in physical clippings for internships, and you&#039;ve got a solid new plan for j-education that I wanna hear :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, positive suggestions here Daniel, but I have to disagree with one major point. The paper likely can&#8217;t afford to go to one-day-a-week in print. If the Emerald&#8217;s ad numbers follow the trend that <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/01/college-newspapers-finally-hit-by-economic-downturn028.html" rel="nofollow">most colleges seem to be in </a>, loosing the print edition is just not financially feasible.</p>
<p>For a as yet <a href="http://www.copress.org/2008/12/04/but-we-make-all-our-money-from-newsprint/" rel="nofollow">undetermined reason</a>, print still works very well for the freesheet college media. Yes, we need to plan for a day when it won&#8217;t, but for now, it&#8217;s still the goose that&#8217;s laying the golden (well… maybe pewter) eggs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest that instead, they move to a web-first newsroom. Get them thinking of the print as a secondary product. It&#8217;s what they put out for the business side, but all <em>real journalists</em> at the paper are concern with the online edition first.</p>
<p>&#8216;Course, figure out how to instill that mindset in a bunch of j-students that are still required to send in physical clippings for internships, and you&#8217;ve got a solid new plan for j-education that I wanna hear <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

